Depending on your doctrinal understanding, the lack of trust in the covenant-making God places or shows one outside the covenant see Hebrews 6: Neil Kruger rated it really liked it Dec 11, Were they in or out? Marlon Lahope rated it it was amazing Nov 22, Jason Staples rated it liked it Mar 01,
This was one of the main disappointments for me. While, being a compatibilist believing that divine sovereignty and human freedom coincide , I feel that Thornhill’s work strengthens the case for human responsibilty. Election and Responsibility The author does a good job of laying out who was considered to be elect and in what way election was both corporate and individual. An Exegetical and Theological Study of Romans 9: Depending on your doctrinal understanding, the lack of trust in the covenant-making God places or shows one outside the covenant see Hebrews 6: Sherif Gendy is currently reading it Nov 19, The author argues that election is primarily corporate, and that Paul falls in line with STJ.
While Paul is certainly able to move beyond these categories, Thornhill shows thornhiill he too follows these patterns. Both were acting in opposition to the covenant they entered, yet Paul refers to them as brethren, demonstrating their position within the covenant community, rebuking and admonishing so to turn them toward a proper life in Christ. I commend Thornhill for his investigative work and excellent treatment of the source documents in presenting his thesis.
Benita Amedeo rated it it was ok Jan 24, While the concept of works performance may appeal to Christians as a correct understanding of such passages as Matthew Cbad rated it it was amazing Jun 16, Especially when it’s reduced to a binary?
New Testament Perspectives: An Intriguing Forthcoming Paul Book
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Refresh and try again. Thornhill functions extremely well within the framework of first-century Jewish thought as he exegetes the Pauline passages, and argues quite persuasively for his intended position. Keith Brooks marked it as to-read Dec 14, This can be shown via examples from the Scriptures. This background helps greatly in understanding the interaction between Jesus and the religious authorities Pharisees, Sadducees, etc.
David rated it really liked it Nov 29, Andrew Dissertaion marked it as to-read Nov 10, Whose Turn Is It? Ronald Johnson marked it as to-read Feb 24, Of course, this may be the very point that Thornhill is seeking to bring to light. Nick added it Nov 30, Cliff Kvidahl marked it as to-read Nov 13, He backs this up by citing examples from Second Temple literature, which shows that Paul did not invent his theology, but was working from a common understanding of Second Temple theology at that time.
The opening chapters seek to answer important questions: Jennifer rated it really liked it Dec 22, Chad Thornhill was one chsd my professors at Liberty University.
I’d almost rather see Jesus and Paul as innovating the corporate election of Israel to graft in the Gentiles – this subverting expectations of large and smaller i.
Chad A. Thornhill MD
Feb 10, Charlotte Gunther rated it really liked it. While, being a compatibilist believing that divine sovereignt In full disclosure, Dr.
While, being a compatibilist believing that divine sovereignty and human freedom coincideI feel that Thornhill’s work strengthens the case for human responsibilty. In other words, if you do the works specified under the covenant, you show yourself to be within the covenant as a child of God, but if you do not, then your failure puts you outside the covenant. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
Still, when the concept of election explicitly relates to the individual, Thornhill argues that the literature of the Second Temple period predictably emphasizes the character or role of the individual, rather than the salvation. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
The church of Galatia had done just the opposite by trying to add works to the grace and freedom given in Christ. Paul, it seems, looks more like a first century Jew than a sixteenth century theologian though I am partial to old theologians! While I’m still not fully in line with his conclusions, I find myself strongly compelled by his research. Disclosure of Material Connection: